Carbon fiber is a material consisting of thin, strong crystalline filaments of carbon, essentially carbon atoms bonded together in long chains. The fibers are extremely stiff, strong, and light, and are used in many processes to create excellent structural materials. Carbon fiber offers a variety of benefits including:
Carbon fiber is made in black strands or yarns called "Tows" and comes in a variety of formats, including spools of tow, unidirectional formats, weaves, braids, and others, which are used to create carbon fiber composite parts.
Within each of these formats are sub-categories of further refinement. For example, different carbon fiber weaves can result in different properties in the composite part.
To create a composite part, the carbon fibers, which are stiff in tension and compression, need to be supported in a stable matrix to maintain the part shape. Epoxy resin is an excellent plastic with good physical properties and is often used for this matrix, with carbon fibers providing the strength.
Since both epoxy and carbon fiber are low-density, one can create a part that is lightweight, but very strong. When fabricating a composite part, a multitude of different processes can be utilized, including wet-layup, vacuum bagging, resin transfer, matched tooling, insert molding, pultrusion, and many other methods. In addition, the selection of the resin allows for tailoring specific properties such as elevated temperature or chemical resistance.
Carbon fiber is extremely stiff, strong, and light. It is typical in engineering to compare the properties of materials in terms of their strength to weight ratio and stiffness to weight ratio, particularly in structural design, where added weight may translate into increased lifecycle costs or unsatisfactory performance.
The stiffness of a material is measured by its modulus of elasticity. This is very similar to Spring Rate, a metric used to describe the stiffness of springs. It is calculated by dividing the change in stress by the change in strain. The modulus of carbon fiber is typically 33 msi (228 Gpa) and its ultimate tensile strength is typically 500 ksi (3.5 Gpa).
The stiffness and strength along any specific axis in a carbon fiber composite part depends not only on fiber and resin mechanical properties, but also on fiber placement and orientation, and fiber/resin ratio (typically approx. 50/50 ratio). A typical value for the stiffness of a carbon fiber composite plate would be 10 msi, and for its strength would be 90 ksi.
Plain-weave carbon fiber reinforced laminate has an elastic modulus of approximately 8 msi and a volumetric density of about 0.05 lbs./in3. The stiffness-to-weight for this material is 160 x 106. By comparison, the density of aluminum is 0.10 lbs./in3, which yields a stiffness to weight of 100 x 106. The density of 4130 steel is 0.30 lbs./in3, which yields a stiffness to weight of 100 x 106.
See table below
|Material||Elastic Modulus||Volumetric Density||Stiffness-to-Weight|
|Plain-Weave Carbon Fiber Composite||8 msi||0.05 lbs./in3||160 x 1066|
|6061-T6 Aluminum||10 msi||0.10 lbs./in3||100 x 106|
|Steel||30 msi||0.30 lbs./in3||100 x 106|
Hence even a basic plain-weave carbon fiber panel has a stiffness-to-weight ratio of 60% greater than aluminum or steel.
Compare the above with 2024-T3 Aluminum, which has a modulus of 10 msi and an ultimate tensile strength of 65 ksi, and 4130 Steel, which has a modulus of 30 msi and ultimate tensile strength of 125 ksi.
Steel will permanently deform at a stress level below its ultimate tensile strength. The stress level at which this occurs is called yield strength. Carbon fiber, on the other hand, will not permanently deform below its ultimate tensile strength, so it effectively has no yield strength.
Higher-stiffness carbon fibers are available through specialized heat treatment processes. The utilization of prepreg, and high-modulus or ultra-high-modulus carbon fiber prepregs, yields substantially higher stiffness-to-weight ratios. For very demanding applications where maximum stiffness is required, 110 msi ultra-high modulus carbon fiber can be used. This specialized pitch-based carbon fiber has a bending stiffness over 3 times that of a standard modulus prepreg panel (about 25 msi). When one considers the possibility of customized carbon fiber panel stiffness through strategic laminate placement, a panel (or other cross-section, such as a tube) can be fabricated with bending stiffness on the order of 50 msi.
All zero-degree oriented unidirectional ultra-high modulus coupon samples have tensile stiffness of more than 70 msi, or over twice the stiffness of steel, yet still only half the weight of aluminum. The stiffness-to-weight ratio of this material is then over 10 times that of either steel or aluminum. When one includes the potentially massive increases in strength-to-weight and stiffness-to-weight ratios possible when these materials are paired with lightweight honeycomb and foam cores, the impact of advanced carbon fiber composites becomes obvious.
A composite sandwich combines the superior strength and stiffness properties of carbon fiber with a lower-density core material. In Dragonplate sandwich sheets, a thin carbon-fiber skin is laminated over a foam, honeycomb, balsa, or birch plywood core. By combining these materials, one can create a final product with a much higher stiffness-to-weight ratio. For applications where weight is critical, carbon-fiber sandwich sheets may be the right fit.
A composite sandwich structure is similar to a homogeneous I-Beam construction in bending.
Referring to the picture of the sandwich structure, at the center of the beam (assuming symmetry) lies the neutral axis, which is where the internal axial stress equals zero.
Moving from bottom to top in the diagram, the internal stresses switch from compressive to tensile. Bending stiffness is proportional to the cross-sectional moment of inertia, as well as the material modulus of elasticity.
Thus, for maximum bending stiffness, one would place an extremely stiff material as far from the neutral axis as possible. By placing carbon fiber furthest from the neutral axis and filling the remaining volume with a lower-density material, the result is a composite sandwich material with a very high stiffness-to-weight ratio.
FEA analyses comparing stress levels in a sandwich laminate vs solid carbon fiber are shown below. These calculations show the deflections of a cantilever beam with a load placed at the end. In the figure, 3/16" birch plywood core laminate is shown next to a solid carbon fiber layup of equal weight. Due to the reduced thickness of the solid carbon beam, it deflects significantly more than the equivalent beam made using a core material. As the thickness increases, this disparity becomes even greater due to the large weight savings from the core. Similarly, one can replace a solid carbon structure with a lighter one of equivalent strength and stiffness made from any of the core options previously mentioned.
When utilizing the various cores, each one has strengths and weaknesses. Typically, the driving factors are compressive and shear strength of the core. For example, if high compressive strength (and hence high crush resistance) is required, then the core will most likely need to be higher density (high-density foam or birch plywood are good options here). If, however, one needs the absolute lowest weight composite possible, and the stresses are relatively small (i.e., low load, high stiffness application), then an extremely lightweight foam or honeycomb core may be the best selection.
Some cores offer better moisture resistance (closed-cell foam), some have better machinability (plywood), and others high compressive strength to weight ratio (balsa). It is up to the engineer to understand the tradeoffs during the design process to maximize the potential of cored composites.
That said, for weight critical applications, there is often no other option that even comes close to the potential strength and stiffness-to-weight ratios of carbon fiber sandwich core laminates.
|PRODUCTS||Stiffness to Weight||Toughness||Crushability||Moisture Resistance||Sound Absorbency|
|Solid Carbon Fiber||GOOD||BETTER||BEST||BEST||POOR|
|High Modulus Solid Carbon Fiber||BETTER||GOOD||BETTER||BEST||POOR|
|Nomex Honeycomb Core||BEST||GOOD||BETTER||BETTER||BEST|
|Depron Foam Core||BETTER||POOR||POOR||BETTER||BETTER|
|Airex Foam Core||BEST||GOOD||GOOD||BETTER||BETTER|
|Divinycell Foam Core||BETTER||BETTER||BETTER||BETTER||GOOD|
Carbon fiber reinforced composites have several highly desirable traits that can be exploited in the design of advanced materials and components (for example, solid carbon sheets, carbon fiber sandwich laminates, carbon tubes, etc.). The two most common uses for carbon fiber are in applications where a high strength to weight and high stiffness to weight are desirable. These include aerospace, military structures, robotics, wind turbines, manufacturing fixtures, sports equipment, and many others.
High toughness can be accomplished when combined with other materials. Certain applications also exploit carbon fiber's electrical conductivity, as well as high thermal conductivity in the case of specialized carbon fiber.
When designing composite parts, one cannot simply compare properties of carbon fiber versus steel, aluminum, or plastic, since these materials are in general homogeneous (properties are the same at all points in the part) and have isotropic properties throughout (properties are the same along all axes). By comparison, in a carbon fiber part, the strength resides along the axis of the fibers, and thus fiber properties and orientation greatly impact mechanical properties. Carbon fiber parts are in general neither homogeneous nor isotropic.
The properties of a carbon fiber part are close to that of steel and the weight is close to that of plastic. Thus, the strength to weight ratio (as well as stiffness to weight ratio) of a carbon fiber part is much higher than either steel or plastic. The specific details depend on the matter of construction of the part and the application. For instance, a foam-core sandwich has an extremely high strength to weight ratio in bending, but not necessarily in compression or crush. In addition, the loading and boundary conditions for any components are unique to the structure within which they reside. Thus, it is impossible for us to provide the thickness of the carbon fiber plate that would replace the steel plate in your application. It is the customer's responsibility to determine the safety and suitability of any Dragonplate product for a specific purpose. This is accomplished through engineering analysis and experimental validation.